|
|
|
|
|
by jeffgus
1203 days ago
|
|
But Netflix was NOT paying transit. They were paying for peering. Transit costs more. To reduce costs, they peered with large networks. The problem is that the company they paid to setup peering (Cogent) didn't want to risk their settlement-free peering agreements. Cogent would have had to start paying for peering. It turned out it was much better for Netflix to setup their own peering agreements. |
|
Netflix prior to the roll out of their Open Connect CDN offering used Akamai, Limelight, and Level 3 as their CDN providers. When they rolled out Open Connect they offered ISPs the ability to peer directly with them at number of different peering exchanges.[4] This was a few years after the Level 3 Comcast spat. You seem to be confusing events.
[1] https://qz.com/256586/the-inside-story-of-how-netflix-came-t...
[2] https://archive.is/2AC6C#selection-735.154-735.169
[3] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/06/fcc-gets-comcast...
[4] https://techcrunch.com/2012/06/04/netflix-open-connect/