|
|
|
|
|
by scarmig
1201 days ago
|
|
Including it would distract from the main point (though IIRC there was no point at which it wasn't a slur; replacing non-slurs with novel non-slurs is a different category). That said, I think it supports my point. How effective has tabooing that slur been at eliminating racism in the USA? |
|
There's no reason to use it now, but understanding the fact that was originally a descriptive word is useful for the history of it.