[explaininjs]

Is it just me or is this the least intuitive format imaginable? The type def is something like:

    type Message = string
    type Speaker = 'system' | 'user' | 'assistant' | 'system name=example_user' | 'system name=example_assistant'
    type CML = ('\n' | '${Speaker}\n${Message}' | {token: '<im_start>'|'<im_end>'})[]

I'd expect something more like...

    type Message = string
    type Speaker = 'system' | 'user' | 'assistant' | 'example_user' | 'example_assistant'
    type CML = {message: Message, speaker: Speaker}[]

[gdb]

Will all make more sense with upcoming releases, we have a lot of extensions in the works :).

[mwint]

Somehow, seeing OpenAI employees adding smilies just makes the sense of impending doom even stronger

[yieldcrv]

Because they're being a good user, for their good Bing.

[warent]

They are a good OpenAI employee :) You are a bad user

[monkeydust]

I am trying to work out the odds of the OpenAI employee not being human.

[ralusek]

Just say you think it's human. Saying you think it's not makes them add 50 million parameters, each time.

[pokoleo]

It's a nice way to say "Hello there :)"

[EGreg]

:-P

[alexwebb2]

When this is extended to have multiple system roles as designated agents, with mechanisms for the assistant to ping a specific agent for more information or completion of a subtask so devs can route that to secondary AIs or services, that’s going to be a very big deal.

Is that what you’re building toward here?