Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by datpiff 1209 days ago
A hotel ban only applies to one hotel or to a chain, not every hotel. Airbnb have a monopoly.
4 comments

A quick search for "airbnb alternatives" shows this isn't quite true. They're just by far the major player.
For starters, they're competing with actual hotels. And in terms of prices it's awfully close these days.
But as long as hotels exist, Airbnb is optional anyway, isn't it? Even ignoring hotels, there are plenty or real BnBs around. I have never felt the need to use Airbnb and haven't suffered from that.
What is Airbnb supposed to have a monopoly on? Their own trademark?
A monopoly on overnight rentals?
I can't think of any competitors in the same space. Maybe they exist, but they're terrible at advertising. Hotels aren't the same industry. Completely different experience.
I've actually been hearing ads for Vrbo on a lot of the podcasts I listen to, so that comes to mind immediately for me. Searching for airbnb alternatives seems to suggest that there are a number of options out there.
This seems like claiming that a pizza place and a taco place aren't competing because they're completely different experiences - I'm still only going to eat one lunch, and I'm only going to use one service for lodging overnight somewhere
They're definitely serving a market with only partial overlap. E.g. I personally am in a market for pizza, but not for tacos.
Well, just for the two you, they have combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell restaurants, so you can have a choice of pizza and/or tacos, depending on what you feel like eating at that exact moment!
VRBO
will check it out, thanks
there is vrbo... hotel aggregators list vacation home rentals. there is couchsurfing. airbnb didn't invent homestays...
Actual bed-and-breakfasts, maybe?