[danans]

> When slave societies were faced with free societies, the free societies tend to bury them.

> Free societies have an inherent advantage, as they better fit human nature.

What are the examples of that which are not also essentially industrial vs feudal or technologically primitive societies?

That history seems pretty thin.

What's more likely is that freer societies are better able to harness the abilities of their inhabitants, and unlike slavery/serfdom based states, they don't have to deploy as many resources to defend against their own enslaved inhabitants. It's a triumph of a better organizational structure, not something inherent to human nature.

Otherwise free societies would have become the norm far earlier in history than they did.

[WalterBright]

> What's more likely is that freer societies are better able to harness the abilities of their inhabitants, and unlike slavery/serfdom based states, they don't have to deploy as many resources to defend against their own enslaved inhabitants. It's a triumph of a better organizational structure, not something inherent to human nature.

I.e. a structure that fits human nature better, making it inherent.

Rome's army consisted of free men, and they conquered everyone else. Slave armies have a poor track record when they come up against free men.

[danans]

> Rome's army consisted of free men, and they conquered everyone else.

Rome relied heavily on slavery. Slaves were 20-30% of the population [1]. The slaves did the labor that allowed the free men to go fight and conquer others. It's not an example of a free society in the slightest.

1. https://byustudies.byu.edu/further-study-chart/6-4-estimated...