|
|
|
|
|
|
by lukeramsden
1204 days ago
|
|
|
> spend 4 hours putting a webflow site on top of GPT APIs GPT _is_ AI though, no? I would think that this would count. Might violate "a re you exaggerating what your AI product can do" or "are you aware of the risks" instead though. |
|
|
Not all of us would agree. We would only take that expression for a rhetoric simplification (a shortening for "part of a broad AI realm"). We would pivot near the concept of "AI" as "a problem solver that could do the job of a professional". This in way excludes e.g. "build convincing text", because it is not (or should not) be a professional task - though it can surely be part of research.
Doubts are possible on all four FTC points - plus more in the linked guidance post from E. Jillison (e.g. "Do more good than harm" - difficult measure on engines which have "relaxed sides").