[throwaway09432]

Very tastefully done. Every one of these items is a huge improvement. This one in particular drives me crazy: `x.map(($) => $.name)`, `x.map .name` is almost Haskell level terseness.

Can this all not be done as experimental typescript though, rather than a new language?

[Yahivin]

Civet aims to be 99% compatible with existing TypeScript so it could be considered an experimental TypeScript. With any luck Civet catches on and does to TS what CoffeeScript did to ES and all the best features trickle into the standard eventually.

The difficult part for TS/JS is they can't easily opt into some of the more whitespace/context sensitive features without breaking changes to existing code or forcing people to opt in with a "jsNext" directive or something.