|
|
|
|
|
by survirtual
1206 days ago
|
|
HTTPS is not plain text. Only the initial DNS resolution is (www.google.com). Everything after that is encrypted — address, payload, etc. The cert authority simply signs a cert saying “this public key belongs and is controlled by the owner of this domain name”. Since we both trust the cert authority, that signature allows us to prevent mitm attacks. From there, we can do a Diffie-Hellman key exchange and derive our secret key for encryption / decryption. That is secure and is the backbone of the internet today. It allows all of us to send messages to an intended recipient without worrying about other parties prying into our business. A proxy introduces an unnecessary and unvetted third party into an exchange. There is significant financial and political motivation for hijacking sessions for higher access to the chatbot & future versions of it. It is not a good pattern to make a habit of. |
|
I used to work professionally for a Cybersecurity company in the past for just 3 years, it was just a short tenure, so my views are plausible.
I have design MITMA boxes for WIFI and HTTPS (For capturing/understanding botnets in honeypots), so I've seen how plain-text HTTPS are. (But again, I am wrong, as I am speaking from experience.)