[colonCapitalDee]

Freedom of speech as defined by the ICCPR is so limited as to be effectively meaningless (which is why ~180 countries have ratified it). It wouldn't protect your ability to report on military misconduct, not wear a hijab, or criticize politicians, for example.

[JenrHywy]

The "public health or morals" clause certainly leaves the door open for abuse. But it's still more useful than talking about the First Amendment as if it applies to the whole world.

I also think it's useful to frame rights both positively and negatively, and to focus on more than just the government's responsibilities.