|
|
|
|
|
|
by comfypotato
1209 days ago
|
|
|
With phone upgrades, for example, and an iOS app. The cost of maintaining different versions of apps for different tiers of payees seems prohibitive. Especially when libraries change constantly. Maybe I’m wrong and your system would work fine. It doesn’t seem right to me though. Personally, I think subscriptions are the way forward, just lower cost subscriptions. Why is 15 a month such a standard? Most of the 15/month apps I shell out for feel more like 3/month or 4/month apps. |
|
|
Perhaps, developers should look for libraries that don't change constantly. That way the could reduce their workload independent from the pricing model.