|
|
|
|
|
by mkl
1210 days ago
|
|
But socket already has a well-established meaning in software. I think even if you succeed with that name, it will be at the unnecessary cost of making network programming more difficult for everyone. It's easy to choose a unique name (even "SocketEngine" might do), and now is the time to do it. Oh, that component is <1000 lines, got it. Whether or not it's officially released, you are already promoting it as an alternative to much more established options, so you should expect people to compare on the same terms. |
|