Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gregjor 1217 days ago
No. Too hard to forecast cash flow on the business side. And how would you handle someone paying half then telling you the device broke?
1 comments

1st year in warranty. Afterwards inspection before recurring payment. If you fake it you have to return the device.
Maybe for an expensive piece of business equipment. For a consumer device I don't see that working -- the logistics of the "inspection" would impose prohibitive costs and administrative hassle. If someone doesn't submit to inspection you just turn them off? Seems like you want a subscription model based on usage, not a pay-for-use setup for the hardware.
It's not a subscription model but rather a user feedback loop. Basically the producer should prove the device is still working rather than the user proving it's not working.