Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lpapez 1217 days ago
The fact is that you gained unauthorized access to personal information, which might be a criminal offence in your jurisdiction despite your honorable intentions. My advice is to let it go and not implicate yourself any further.

Relevant personal anecdote from the EU: one time I was checking the API of a service I wanted to use and managed to obtain full access to the database which among bunch of PII also contained plaintext passwords. Being a good citizen, I decided to report the problem to national CERT instead of the company, because I had prior experience with such reports where the company reacted with a lawsuit threat. The response from CERT was "While your intents are noble, you just admitted to gaining unauthorized access and we will forward this information to the company if they decide to take legal action".

This was 2 years ago, luckily the company did not press charges, the data in question is still wide open for hacking and I could not care less anymore. Learned my lesson that there is no room for good Samaritans in web security.

1 comments

Just send from an email not under your real name.

Further, I am not sure the company can prove this is unauthorized access when they provide the data without requiring authentication (through negligence). They could claim, we made it open to public but the public is not supposed to download it, but this is a difficult claim, eg, it should have been clearly stated in their website at minimum. It’s a bit like public photography.

Sending anonymously could work if possible, here you have to be authenticated with your government email, otherwise they just ignore it.

On the other topic: it definetly isn't anything like public photography you mentioned, at least not in my jurisdiction. Here it is enough that the company says "you were not supposed to see that data" and that is enough to claim unauthorized access. It is then up to the court to prove that they had adequate protections etc.

The OP says they are based in Canada. It definetly warrants hiring a lawyer to get advice on this matter, but IMO it is not worth it at all. The best possible outcome is getting a tap on the back and a thanks from the company, the worst possible outcome is legal proceedings. Expected net gain is negative.