|
|
|
|
|
by randytandy
1206 days ago
|
|
Okay thank you, @fwir, @asdajksah2123, @lathiat
These points make much more sense however If there is 1.75% of counterparty risk then why do bank transfers charge fixed rates of 0, 3 Euro and alike. If the underlying transfer is swift, sepa, wire then shouldn't this be the baseline? That or give the option to accept the counter party risk for failure of transfers. And there surely is signing methods that one could do as an escrow like service to mitigate most of the fee |
|
Fumbling around with credit cards or IBAN numbers + having your banking app fail randomly when trying to authorize payments is annoying. PayPal just works. Also, if you're some random shop on the internet many customers prefer to pay via PayPal rather providing you banking details or credit card numbers.
> That or give the option to accept the counter party risk for failure of transfers.
In Germany, merchants frequently offer to be paid by IBAN in advance or by invoice after the delivery. No fees, but the risk is fully on one side.
> And there surely is signing methods that one could do as an escrow like service to mitigate most of the fee.
PayPal basically acts like an escrow with their buyer protection policy. If you find another provider, good luck convincing the customers.