|
|
|
|
|
by jlawson
1215 days ago
|
|
Not a publicity stunt, and not something anyone asked for. The publisher does not have a rational unified will. It is made of up people and its actions are a product of internal politics. In this case, as is usual, a tiny group of hyper-motivated woke ideologues would have banded together to push for these changes, and deployed the usual array of ideological superweapons that the woke have access to in our culture-space (there are no antibodies to their power plays unlike traditional religions, and pushback against woke ideas in institutional contexts is often legally punishable by various mechanisms related to civil rights law). This tiny group swung the publisher to its will, because they care with the self-destructive fervor of religious zealots, and everyone else is just trying to get along, so they win despite being a microminority. It's another step in the long march through the institutions; basically all our academic, corporate, cultural, military, and scientific establishments have fallen under woke control by the same mechanisms. Ref: https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dict... |
|