Signal is not a crypto mixer. The argument here is about the frequency a certain service is used for crime.
For example, library records generally have a fair amount of privacy. Criminals sometimes consult libraries. Crime is not the dominant use of libraries.
Mixers have a fair amount of privacy. Mixers are used by criminal, and crime is overwhelmingly the dominant use of mixers.
To rebut this you’d need to show large and innocent use cases which use mixers. Not an unrelated app.
I'm only arguing the definition shouldn't be changed to something that is explicitly negative, even if the vast majority of the time it's used for nefarious reasons.
For example, library records generally have a fair amount of privacy. Criminals sometimes consult libraries. Crime is not the dominant use of libraries.
Mixers have a fair amount of privacy. Mixers are used by criminal, and crime is overwhelmingly the dominant use of mixers.
To rebut this you’d need to show large and innocent use cases which use mixers. Not an unrelated app.