Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bawolff 1214 days ago
> I smell an underlying sentiment of "if the attacker has access to the DB, then it is broken anyways"

To be more clear, my position is - if the service allows you to set the password for an arbitrary user, then it is broken anyways.

1 comments

Again, not necessarily. This depends on the hashing scheme you use. Eg. if setting a correct password hash relies on you having access to private keys.
No it does not.

Either you allow bcrypt hashes, or this bug is inapplicable. If you are encrypting your hashes or something, then this bug cannot be leveraged.

Yes, for this very specific bug. This thread taked about having access to the database as a general attack vector.