|
|
|
|
|
by kossTKR
1207 days ago
|
|
I mean it's literally right in standard macro-history; religious cults, clubs, closed societies in all forms through literally all ages. A newer very interesting book on the subject going back even further: [The Power of Ritual in Prehistory
Secret Societies and Origins of Social Complexity](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/power-of-ritual-in-preh...) I find it weird that - especially americans - still don't think in terms of groups, but see the individual as the driver of history - a historiographical school that has been outdated for 70 years now. |
|
As an American, I find this statement radically perplexing.
Through the scourge of identity politics, we do nothing but categorize people into groups in basically every avenue of society. You can't go to college without your group affecting you. You can't find a good job without your group mattering.
Individualists who essentially want to take the Martin Luther King Jr speech literally (I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.) can be castigated as the most vile people by some for not wanting to treat anybody differently from anybody else.