[mcv]

But they used github just for git. If they hadn't mentioned github, nobody could have known. Or cared.

[unyttigfjelltol]

I'm not a web design professional, but they appear to have used it 3 ways-- 1) hosting and URL; 2) GitHub logo/branding on the footer and 3) back office collaboration tool.

I suspect it was uses #1 and #2 that generated the confusion, and while I am sympathetic to their feelings about the competition and DQ, I too might have been confused about whether they leveraged a "Wix-like" function to generate the page.

[Goz3rr]

To you and me it seems obvious, but to someone less familiar the rules clearly say using Github is prohibited, even if it is for the wrong reasons. At that point you should either get clarification of the rules, or take the risk and end up in the situation OP is in now.

[pulse7]

So using GitLab for the exact same thing would be OK?

[rovr138]

>sites that generate HTML from text, markdown, or script files, such as Webs, Wix, Weebly, GitHub, Jekyll, and Replit, are NOT permitted

Technically GitLab also generates html from markdown.

[mcv]

I would expect so, yes.