[xp84]

I don't know how I feel about the main question of AI copyright-ability*, but do disagree with the idea that if the outputs of a tool used by the artist are very random, it means the end product is not creativity.

The Jackson Pollack example cited in the article is apt. Lots of artists use randomness-infused techniques, and select their final product from among many random versions based on what came out the best.

*However I am pretty confident that the result will eventually land on "Works created by big media companies, even done entirely using AI, are fully copyrightable."