[freejazz]

Then there might be a circumstance where it is promoting something. Your point? The law shouldn't make this illegal because then YouTube would have to have greater regard for what it surfaces? I'm not sure that's a bad thing, that's the entire point of the thread.

[MichaelZuo]

It obviously is a circumstance that is occurring every second of the day. Not some hypothetical 'might be'. The parent has a point.

[freejazz]

My point wasn't the frequency of it but rather that it might be the case that some of YouTube's operations do work that way... so what? Is YouTube's convenience the point of law? No. So why does it matter?