[hot_gril]

When in doubt, best to start with something quick n' dirty and not worry too much about what happens when it becomes inadequate. Just make sure it can be easily replaced when needed, which means treating everything you write as disposable. When using hindsight, you can build something better.

There's a big back-and-forth thread about this where I explain why well-written code on our team ends up being deleted within 1-2 years, and the author's only mistake was spending so much time deliberating over the code.

[seymourhersh]

“Just make sure it can be easily replaced when needed”, implies a clean architecture of some kind - which implies experience.

Perhaps you’re just better than you realize.

[hot_gril]

Eh, if you're given a well-separated API to deal with, the code can be pretty terrible without being hard to replace. What makes it hard to replace is when someone puts a lot of thought into it and doesn't want you to rewrite it.