[thisoneworks]

You want guaranteed specific behavior from a software system (that's what SLAs and contracts are for) and easily reason about it so you can hire a college grad to tweak it. And that's not even talking about datasets, you can only train something accurate if you have enough good data on it? I can only see software 2.0 being a better autocorrect for internet scale usecases (in the short term atleast, until the next breakthrough)

This also reminds me of a quote from the Book I'm currently reading (Practical Wisdom by Barry Schwarz)

“Most of us think about empathy as a “feeling” or an “emotion.” It is. To be empathetic is to be able to feel what the other person is feeling. But empathy is more than just a feeling. In order to be able to feel what another person is feeling, you need to be able to see the world as that other person sees it. This ability to take the perspective of another demands perception and imagination. Empathy thus reflects the integration of thinking and feeling.”

"Mind reading" is another way to put it (https://yosefk.com/blog/people-can-read-their-managers-mind....) - this practical wisdom + mind reading is basically the salient human feature that NNs would never be able to replace so you would always have humans in the system.