[ageek123]

This seems like a lot of discussion for a single report from a possibly-disgruntled (but definitely rejected) candidate, about a policy that was denied by multiple Databricks employees in the thread, who clearly said that Databricks has hired a number of people who were laid off recently.

[password11]

What I find strange in OP's story is that HC and recruiter actually gave a reason for the rejection. Most companies after they reject you are tight-lipped.

> denied by multiple Databricks employees in the [Blind] thread, who clearly said...

That proves nothing. HR departments shill on Blind.

[ageek123]

I agree “HR departments shill on Blind” but the claim made by several people in that thread (at least one who said they are a hiring manager) that Databricks has recently hired multiple people who were laid off is verifiable as true or false. It’s not just a generic weasel statement like “it’s not our policy to…” or “we treat all applicants fairly” or something like that.

[password11]

> but the claim made by several people in that thread (at least one who said they are a hiring manager) that Databricks has recently hired multiple people who were laid off is verifiable as true or false

How exactly, again, did you verify their identity as a hiring manager?

[dclowd9901]

Yes, same here. The banality of job rejection is quite far from many of the anecdotes I read about it.