Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 93po 1214 days ago
This is a very libertarian mindset. The government exists (should exist) to serve its population. We shouldn't rely on private charity for the basics of a functioning society.
2 comments

I do think the government purpose is to serve it's population and society.

But I also think that it is business's purpose to serve society as well. At some point we moved away from that.

We used to have companies that would donate to the school library or to fund school technology programs. Now, some of that was rooted in the idea that they would need workers in the future so this was part of the pipeline but it was also building society. (You still do see companies donating money to sports programs, for their banner to be displayed)

Currently companies are all complaining about the lack of X, yet are they funding training for X? No, we expect workers to come in fully trained and ready to go.

Looking beyond that, companies are willing to up and shift counties in order to save money but that has effects on the local economy.

Its a prisoners dilemma if you expect business to contribute towards infrastructure that benefits everybody. education and infrastructure has to rely on the government for this reason.
even the most liberal parts of US will not go anywhere near doing such thing. As the name might suggest, I live in such area and the attitude towards such things will not get any backing anywhere (government or private businesses)
I mean, food stamps are a thing. Free school lunches are a thing/are becoming a thing. Public housing is a thing. Medicare/Medicaid is a thing. There's a lot more we could do to make these systems more efficient, less expensive for tax payers, and also provide them much more widely. Clearly there's public support for them, by most, in some capacity.