[thfuran]

Yes, and it's only that assertion that is made under penalty of perjury, not the assertion that the targeted work actually infringes on that copyright.

[yeahbutiguess]

So, if they aren't the copyright holder (as in this case) they have committed perjury by asserting they are.

[thfuran]

Possibly not if they thought they had a valid claim, but I really don't know how that would work out in practice.