[VadimPR]

How good is the quality of this? BLOOM is a 176B parameter model, but it doesn't seem to compare to GPT-3 (175B parameters) in terms of output quality.

[lossolo]

It's because BLOOM is undertrained, you can prune a lot of weights in BLOOM and it doesn't impact performance. Look at Chinchilla paper[1], 70B model outperforms 175B GPT-3 model.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556

[Der_Einzige]

In general, most giant LLMs are extremely undertrained at this time. Consider that most of the gains in RoBerta vs bert were from just continuing to train.

[stevenhuang]

Cases of undertraining can be observed whenever the output is repeating gibberish or loops. Happened a lot in GPT2 ai dungeon days

[leobg]

So can we continue training RoBERTa to get it to, say, GPT3 Ada level

[rnosov]

Out of curiosity, how did your measure their respective performances? My understanding is that BLOOM roughly comparable to GPT-3 in performance on most NLP tasks. Were you comparing OpenAI davinci to raw BLOOM by any chance?

[VadimPR]

Compared ChatGPT to BLOOM - which I know doesn't benefit from RLHF.