[melvyn2]

From wikipedia:

> Computer programs can use a TPM to authenticate hardware devices, since each TPM chip has a unique and secret Endorsement Key (EK) burned in as it is produced.

That EK is signed by the TPM manufacturer, and so it’s likely they’ll only trust the keys of physical TPM manufacturers. Good luck forging that in software.

[userbinator]

I wonder if we'll get a cat-and-mouse game with miscellaneous TPM manufacturers "accidentally" leaking their keys, getting blacklisted, creating new ones, etc. I'd like to think that there's at least a nontrivial amount of the population wanting to subvert the authoritarian corporatocracy and with the skills to do so.

[qbasic_forever]

It's going to be an extremely janky or very private website if they only allow you to use it when you have 1 of like a dozen supported and approved hardware TPMs to view it.

[syrrim]

The latest windows version requires a hardware tpm on a device in order to be installed. Every hardware vendor has therefore included a tpm on all their new machines. This was already standard on apple devices, and many android devices have one as well.

[qbasic_forever]

Sure but someone who wants to build a web scraper won't care, they could use their own homebrew TPM that does a no-op and claims a user pressed a button or was present when they actually were not there.

I doubt websites will go to the trouble to keep a list of approved TPMs. It's the SSL root certs nightmare all over again and even worse. No one is going to want to deal with managing a whole new giant list of devices, having fire drill updates to revoke compromised ones, etc.