I mean, the same is true for C++. If some C++ library you use employs GC, you can’t abstract that away either. The actual difference is how frequent such libraries are in the respective ecosystem.
> The actual difference is how frequent such libraries are in the respective ecosystem.
That’s a difference without a distinction: people will use the defaults unless they can’t.
So in C++ libraries will avoid GCs unless their work basically requires it, whereas in D they’ll require it unless the author is constrained to a nogc requirement.
That’s a difference without a distinction: people will use the defaults unless they can’t.
So in C++ libraries will avoid GCs unless their work basically requires it, whereas in D they’ll require it unless the author is constrained to a nogc requirement.