|
|
|
|
|
|
by valdiorn
1261 days ago
|
|
|
I just absolutely fail to see the issue with CGI porn, even of the underage variety (because let's face it, that's all anyone is going to care about when it comes to banning it). Trying to argue that fake pictures of non existent kids doing bad shit is somehow "child porn" is about as dumb as saying Saw (the movie) is an actual snuff film. Is it vulgar and offensive - of course. Is it child porn - no, because the person in the picture does not exist. |
|
|