|
|
|
|
|
by meese712
1219 days ago
|
|
I'm confused how this would reduce disease progression compared to a much cheaper allo bone marrow transplant then if they are only modifying hematopoietic stem cells since a BMT is just doing the exact same thing except with someone else's non affected cells. BMTs are a horrific procedure though so this definitely has an advantage in that regard. I would also have to imagine they would have to do myeloablative chemo or radiation to make sure the fixed cells propagate more than the diseased cell line. Edit: read the study, they do give them the same chemo used for normal transplants. |
|
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/104/12/3501/89040/...
>Previous studies have shown that 30% to 70% of all patients surviving beyond 100 days after HCT require treatment for chronic GHVD,2,4-6 often for more than 2 years.
Re: a better system is where you don't need donors:
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/l-i-woman-dies-after-ma...