|
|
|
|
|
by timerol
1212 days ago
|
|
> I'm pretty sure that maintaining a C++ codebase is less than 7.7 times more expensive than Node, even if you throw in extra development time etc. The problem here is assuming that a 7.7x less expensive AWS bill is the same value as a 7.7x more expensive development time. Imagine an app that is maintained by one programmer costing $10k a month and running in AWS for $1k a month. It is not worth dividing that AWS cost by 10x if it means a 10% development time hit. Actual numbers may vary, but development often costs much more than running in AWS. (For startups it's even more of a difference, because you pay AWS as you get more traffic, but you pay developers before you have an MVP.) |
|