|
|
|
|
|
|
by justapassenger
1213 days ago
|
|
|
> > it lacks any safety lifecycle process
> completely demonstrably false Head of AP, testified under oath, that they don't know what's Operational Design Domain. I'll just leave it at that. > > speed of pushing stuff to customers (on the order of days)
> this is also false and doesn't happen Never ever Musk tweeted about .1 fixing some critical issues coming in next few days? I must live in a different timeline. > > you cannot possibly claim you can even such a basic things like proper change management (no, commit message isn’t that) or validation.
> you know absolutely nothing about the internal timelines of developments and deployments at tesla and to suggest it's impossible without that knowledge is just dishonest Let's assume I have no internal information. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. |
|
|
Lets say you have a baby which is being born. You tweet, birth in ten days! You can't then say, look: here is a tweet, it proves that baby development in tweeters actually has a several day lifecycle and moreover it proves that baby having mother's don't do proper pre-birth routines, because the tweet isn't the process that created the baby.
It is separate.
> If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Right. So the fact that we have video evidence of internal processes, including QA processes, is much more like looking, swimming, and quacking like a duck much like having video evidence of a mother with a round belly for months before the tweet would be evidence that the babies don't take weeks to develop.
So when Elon has also tweeted that a launch was delayed, because of issues that were discovered - which does happen, as I'm sure you know if you follow his tweets as you imply - then that would be evidence congruent with the video evidence we have of QA processes existing within the company.