|
|
|
|
|
by Veserv
1213 days ago
|
|
I used to be on the other side of this, but now I agree with you. The official meaning of a recall is providing a record of a defect, informing the public that the product is defective, and making the manufacturer financially liable for either remediating the defect or providing a refund. However, the colloquial definition of a “recall” now means a product must be physically returned. To better represent the nature of a “recall” they should instead call it something like “notice of defect”. In the case of safety critical problems like here they should use a term like “notice of life-endangering defect” to properly inform the consumers that the defect is actively harmful instead of merely being a failure to perform as advertised. tl;dr They should change the terminology from “recall” to “Notice of Life-Endangering Defect” |
|