[nradov]

Do the popular Linux distributions for both desktop and server environments provide such a list? Have Teams, Windows 365, or Widgets been used as attack vectors against real systems?

Generally users in most enterprises are going to need instant messaging and online meeting tools, so if it's not Teams then it will be something else with an equivalent attack surface area. Windows 365 appears to be highly secure.

I'm not trying to defend Microsoft here. They have had many security flaws and there will be more to come. It's just not clear whether the alternatives are significantly better.

[galleywest200]

> Do the popular Linux distributions for both desktop and server environments provide such a list?

Yes, this is common. You are generally given the option at install how "minimal" you wish to go (do you even want a GUI installed, etc). These are often listed on the distributions website.

For example here is a few from Arch:

- Base (bare minimum) install: https://archlinux.org/packages/core/any/base/

- Base-devel (what you need to run makepkg): https://archlinux.org/packages/core/any/base-devel/

[taeric]

I already said this is not unique to Windows. Such that I don't see the point of the first question. On whether those have been source of attacks, I don't have numbers. I do remember getting hacked through Office back in the day. The whole "open this document" crap college students did to each other. To that end, I fully cede this could just be a false view from my side.

I'd expect most attacks are still of the "what is your password" variety. That along with a giant shared drive that everyone just dumps everything into.

And I don't mean this as an offensive against just Microsoft. They are/were somewhat unique in the success they had with embrace/extend. That said, the blame almost as surely rests on typical "growth at all costs" mental model that is modern business.