[phaylon]

You know, people outside the Rust community keep bringing this up as some kind of argument against it. But to me, it's one of the biggest points for it; because the important thing about `unsafe` encapsulation isn't what's inside of it, but what's possible on the outside.

[sidlls]

I bring it up because Rust evangelists like to pretend that Rust code with no explicit “unsafe” in it is safe. It’s not safe, though, as long as the dependencies use it.

I enjoy coding in Rust. I don’t enjoy the shit name its community gives it.

[howinteresting]

All safe code that exists in any language is built on unsafe code. Unsafe code is fundamental to computers. Your frame is unhelpful, not illuminating.