[Brian_K_White]

It's like single glyphs version of what's going on with ai assistants: confidently wrong, wrong but looks good so you trust it.

When a normal old codec is used at too low quality levels, it looks like low quality and you do not trust the data.

Maybe the codec needs to include a disclamer watermark that it injects into the output that the image was processed by jbig2 with the aggressive option and all text is not to be trusted.