Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pazimzadeh 1217 days ago
I thought the article was telling us that it's not inert?

edit (can't delete): oh you're talking about eating 'sand'

2 comments

Nothing thats nano is inert.

That being said even inert things can act as catalysts, and even if they don't act as catalysts, they can sterically interfere with reactions

I assume we eat lots of dust especially if you live in a dry climate next to a desert.
But its not nano
https://academic.oup.com/toxres/article/11/4/565/6645393

Has the sources of silica nano particles.

The article is telling us that nanoparticles are not inert. But that's much smaller than sand or silt.