|
|
|
|
|
|
by mthoms
1217 days ago
|
|
|
Well, here's your previous quote: >Even with the knowledge that the doxxing is leading to stalkers endangering not just the wealthy target but also his young child, you would fund the doxxer? That’s pretty monstrous. If there is a kidnapping or murder down the line, your money will have helped enable it. It looks like there was a perfectly accurate representation of what you said. At least your current claim is a little more tempered: >I believe it's an unethical choice to donate to the legal fund of someone intentionally and stubbornly engaging in that kind of behavior Your characterization of supporting @ElonJet seems to have changed from complicity in child murder to merely making an "unethical choice". That's quite the walk-back. |
|
|
No, it’s not. I still do think the donation would be monstrous, and that if there were a murder or kidnapping enabled by the doxxing, that it would be on the donor’s conscience for the rest of their life.
That doesn’t mean I have to help ceejayoz derail and inflame this thread, more than two months later. Phrasing my position less aggressively was an intentional choice.
Also, taking the most extreme snippet of what I said in an extended conversation out of context is not an accurate representation.
A key part of what I said is the conditional you quoted from my post that ceejayoz removed. I said, if there were a murder or kidnapping caused by the doxxing activity then the money donated in support of it will have…supported it.