[Johnny555]

That makes fun movie dialog, but I don't think the car company decides on their own whether or not to do a safety recall. The NHTSA can force them to do a recall for a serious issue if the manufacturer doesn't do it voluntarily. The NHTSA usually finds out about defects by owners filing directly with the NHTSA, so it doesn't take direct cooperation from the manufacturer to start an investigation.

[rocket_surgeron]

The entire movie is a teenaged cringeworthy fever dream.

Either immediately before or after that scene he goes on to tell his neighbor that the only reason oxygen masks are on airplanes is to keep people calm when they are about to die.

>-Tyler Durden: Oxygen gets you high. In a catastrophic emergency, you're taking giant panicked breaths. Suddenly you become euphoric, docile. You accept your fate. It's all right here. Emergency water landing, 600 miles an hour. Blank faces, calm as Hindu cows.”

Airline companies don't care if people are "calm" if they are going to die. They are not worried about the upset ghosts of dead passengers coming to haunt them. And oxygen doesn't turn you into a docile cow. I'm a volunteer EMT and if oxygen turned people docile that would make my job a hell of a lot easier.

The oxygen is there to keep you alive at altitude if there is a decompression event. At sea level it does nothing. edit: the partial pressure of oxygen at sea level is ~160mmHg and airplane passenger masks supply ~122mmHg-- they only exist to keep you alive until the pilot can descend.

One of the easiest ways to tell if I'm not going to get along with someone is if they unironically quote Fight Club.

[yamtaddle]

You appear to have understood the movie.

> One of the easiest ways to tell if I'm not going to get along with someone is if they unironically quote Fight Club.

Yep, lots of people... don't understand the movie.

You'd think when it came to creating a strict cult and cutting people's balls off and shit, people'd start to go "wait a minute... wasn't this about escaping the media- and corporation-driven rat-race for freedom, and, uh, masculinity or something? WTF?" and start to get a clue that they maybe shouldn't trust everything this Tyler guy says because a lot of it might just be nice-sounding bullshit, let alone where it goes from there—but, shockingly, no.

On the one hand, if so many people get it wrong, maybe that's the movie's fault; but on the other, it's not like the movie's subtle.

[filoleg]

Agreed. To add to it, the movie has some even more obvious things that make the actual message clear.

The narrator keeps talking about how "everything is a copy of a copy of a copy", and Tyler keeps advocating for "breaking out of the system" to become individuals. Only for everyone to join project mayhem, shave their heads, dress in exact same clothing, get rid of their own names, and to obey every command of Tyler without questioning. None of it was subtle at all, it was as thick as it could possibly get. And there are plenty of examples in the movie that reaffirm those points too.

I don't think of any way they could've made the entire message of the movie any more obvious, other than explicitly spelling it out.

[filoleg]

> The entire movie is a teenaged cringeworthy fever dream.

I think you might have missed the entire point of the movie. It legitimately criticizes and satirizes Tyler, the narrator, and everyone involved in project mayhem as immature edgelords with their entire premise being self-contradicting.

I am still baffled by how many adults watch that movie and get the entire opposite message of what the movie was trying to tell. It's like watching Breaking Bad and coming to a conclusion that the point of the show was to show Walter White as a great human being.

[yamtaddle]

I wouldn't quite paint everyone in Project Mayhem as immature edgelords (not even the narrator)—I think there's some genuine hole in their lives and need for belonging that's missing, and that society/capitalism/the-standard-life-plan/media-defined-masculinity/whatever isn't providing.

Thing is, Tyler's message and the way he actually "helps" these people are very much at-odds, and a lot of his message is, in fact, immature edgelord shit, sprinkled with trite and well-worn but not exactly wrong nuggets of kinda-wisdom.

I actually think Tyler's being a bit appealing, at first, is an important part of the movie. If the audience isn't convinced someone could fall for his schtick, the story doesn't work very well.

In fact, I think the film's maybe more relevant than ever. There are whole movements and personalities that look an awful lot like Tyler's mix of true-and-false and smart-and-stupid "wisdom", and in a lot of cases they are (nominally) addressing actual problems or something that's missing for a lot of people.

[filoleg]

> I actually think Tyler's being a bit appealing, at first, is an important part of the movie.

Absolutely agreed. On a surface level, especially in the beginning, Tyler is this good looking guy who does what he wants in the face of the world, and is pretty appealing and charismatic. To make people understand the point, you need to make them relate to the situation in a good way. Having a cool and a charismatic guy who is pissed at the world in similar ways to you is a really great hook.

The concerns of people who fell for project mayhem were indeed valid in the real world at the time (and imo still are), such as heavily increasing consumerism, apathy due to a lack of direction, etc., which made it very relatable. I don't know how common it is among people empirically, but I definitely had a brief moment in life when I felt the whole "everything is a copy of a copy of a copy". And I would not be surprised to find out that this is actually very common.

Those things are something that resonates with a ton of people in real life, but majority of people have much healthier ways of acting on those feelings, compared to how people in the fight club acted on them. However, many definitely fantasized about acting out in "edgy" ways in response, and the movie just used those fantasies to illustrate where the satirized logical conclusion leads.

[Rebelgecko]

The movie quote is loosely based on a memo that Ford sent to the NHTSA to lobby against new safety standards. The so-called Pinto Memo has a lot of mythology around it. It wasn't specific to the Ford Pinto, but it was used in some of the Pinto lawsuits to say "this is the kind of cost-benefit analysis that Ford does when designing their fuel systems". The Pinto Memo also didn't compare the cost of safety improvements against potential lawsuits-it compared them against the NHTSA's own figure for the financial value of saving a life.

[mywittyname]

It still takes people being injured or dying over many years to find out about a flaw that was known to several levels of engineering & management during the design phase of a car.

[stonemetal12]

For the Takata airbag recalls most if not all major auto makers announced recalls before being forced to by the various transportation authorities. In the US for example recalls were announced by automakers in June, NHTSA didn't make it mandatory until November (according to wikipedia anyway).

Though given this is a security thing, not a safety one is there an agency that could force the recall?

[rtkwe]

In the early stages or sufficiently low levels of B they can. The NHTSA doesn't investigate every crash like the FAA does for plane crashes.

[sokoloff]

The NTSB has a much larger role than the FAA in plane crash investigations.

[rtkwe]

True I knew in the moment I wasn't quite right about the exact agency. The core point stands though imo, car crashes don't receive the same scrutiny airplane crashes do in most cases.