|
|
|
|
|
|
by PaulHoule
1220 days ago
|
|
|
It's not (1) "reacting to the reaction" which is the endpoint but (2) not having that reaction. If (1) is important it as because that is the path to (2). I'd say a company that has accomplished (2) has cut the workload in hiring employees by 30-50% in the sense that every employee who has reaction (1) either internally or externally is at risk for being disengaged or leaving soon. Not only that but you are probably wasting your dev's time and could get dramatically more productivity out of them if you aren't WTFing them to death. |
|
|