| > Now it's Oh, don't get snarky. "Functional" air defence, whatever. It's just worth to filter out anything with the kind of air defence that's just dude with a machine-gun shooting in the air or something that wasn't operational or whatever. Providing an example is always good for a substantial discussion. > You should probably provide a timeline because I would just give examples from World War II or something and that would effectively "prove you wrong". I don't suppose it's worth discussing anything that cannot be relatively safely considered as "modern warfare". > which is incorrect, as you know I don't, that's why I am asking. > the US can launch missiles and take out air defence elements Air defence is kinda also supposed to protect from missiles. > the US has developed weapons platforms that can do so Are you implying hypersonic missiles? They are relatively new and poorly tested, not even in serial production AFAIK. |