|
|
|
|
|
by BoorishBears
1224 days ago
|
|
> Yes, it's what thinkers do :) You're proving that thinking and knowing are wholly uncorrelated. > Not all Language Models need to be based on relational frequencies of term occurrence. "A language model is a probability distribution over sequences of words" If you don't even know what an LM is, I don't feel like reading the rest of this. |
|
Whereas your contribution is?
> know
An interview with Yann LeCun came out yesterday: he defined (S)LMs along those lines. Maybe discuss the matter with him. Does YLC represent an authoritative part enough for you?
> don't feel
"Outstanding". Does not make much sense here