|
|
|
|
|
by hikawaii
1224 days ago
|
|
Yeah I live in a place where the walkscore is like 30, and am able to get more places I need to go via walking than when I lived in downtown Seattle. They're even adding a bike and walk link to the carmall on the outskirts of town, connecting it with the rest of the city on a traffic separated trail. Meanwhile, in Seattle it was 2 miles to get to the grocery store and took all day while dealing with city car traffic. The problem isn't "car centric" design, the problem is that nobody is designing anything at all. |
|
Walkscore isn't a realistic measure of anything.
I once lived in a place with a Walkscore of 80+. Looking at the details of the score, it was largely because Walkscore counts pornography shops as bookstores.
Along those lines, I imagine Walkscore also counts peep shows as movie theaters, and strip clubs as general family entertainment centers.
Meanwhile, in Seattle it was 2 miles to get to the grocery store and took all day while dealing with city car traffic.
When I lived in Seattle, I didn't even own a car. I could get everywhere I need to on a bus, or train, or walking. Perhaps you have a different definition of "downtown" than where I lived. If you were two miles away from the Whole Foods on Westlake, then you weren't downtown.