[Rygian]

Your message is not compatible with "The Clean Hydrogen Ladder" report [0] which I take as solid reference on what hydrogen investments make sense.

Here's an illustrative quote:

"By now everyone should have managed to get their head around the fundamental inefficiency of turning electricity into hydrogen, compressing it, storing it, moving it around and then converting it back into power on board a vehicle. Somewhere between half and three quarters of the input power is wasted, and this is not going to change much - there are fundamental thermodynamic constraints. Not only that, but the H2FC vehicles are also much more complicated so they have higher maintenance costs, and although hydrogen can be safely handled, you really don't want it in every garage and workshop. You can forget use cases like urban delivery, two and three wheelers, metro trains and buses."

[0] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/clean-hydrogen-ladder-v40-mic...

[_hypx]

That's pure gibberish. Just some marketing propaganda with zero evidence behind any of it.

In reality, batteries are not sustainable and need vast amounts of raw materials to exist. Hydrogen vehicles lets you avoid this. That is a fundamental and unbreakable advantage.

Also, a fuel cell is an electrochemical system. Meaning fuel cell cars are EVs too. The notion that somehow this is an impossible technology, or even one that has any meaningful limitations compared to any other kind of EV is entirely a lie.