[threeseed]

> Bless them, but PostgreNoSQL would be so much better for all the use cases I have than MongoBD

And for some of us MongoDB is a better option than PostgreSQL.

Many of us simply can't rely on scalability and high availability being something that isn't part of the core product.

[winrid]

The built in horizontal scaling of Mongo is nice, but I would still put PG's reliability per-instance higher than Mongo's.

The reason being that Mongo is written in C++ with lots of RAII and will simply die on a memory allocation failure. Postgres won't. It'll keep running in many low memory scenarios and the operation will error out.

[kaoD]

In what way is scalability and high availability not part of Postgres' core?

[moehm]

Master-master replication probably, think Galera.