|
|
|
|
|
|
by pabs3
1226 days ago
|
|
|
The word "open" in your custom definition of "open source" is quite vague, open to whom and open in what ways? The OSI says those should be "whoever receives a copy of the binaries" and "open to read/run/modify/distribute for original/modified versions". The OSI definition is much more useful to me as a software user and programmer than any other definition I have seen. |
|
|