Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 13of40 1221 days ago
Something else conspicuously missing from these services is a checkbox to make it never show me something again. Why do I have to scroll through an endless line of "nope", "nope", "nope", "definitely not", "no" every night, then look at all the same stuff tomorrow? Does someone get paid when I have to sacrifice a brain cell for each of these minor decisions?
3 comments

Netflix allows you to down vote the content with "Not for me" (thumb down) option. Then it stops suggesting it. The sneaky part is that the option itself is hidden a bit, under "thumb up" button (which expands to three different options if you hover your mouse over it), so I guess we've found another dark pattern :)
The real problem is that each platform just doesn't have that much content. Everyone wants their own platform, and now the content is so fragmented that if you noped out of titles for very long you'd realize they have very little else.
But I have the same experience on youtube.
> Does someone get paid when I have to sacrifice a brain cell for each of these minor decisions?

In many cases, probably, either directly or indirectly. Payola is huge in the music industry and it’s why, despite never having heard of Harry Styles before, Apple Music started pushing him into every corner of their app for a few weeks after his last album release. I can understand surfacing artists who are likely to be popular with the general population. But this was clearly more than that. I’m sure it’s the same with video services. They’re paid to promote specific shows. It probably also costs them less to show you their own shows, so those are probably surfaced more frequently than shows from other companies, etc.