|
|
|
|
|
by stereosteve
1218 days ago
|
|
I think nostr is better in this regard: - The "account" primitive is just a key pair, but you can layer more auth requirements on top of that.
- All messages are always signed by your key pair end to end.
- Server admin can't read your DMs or edit your messages. The worst they can do is see public posts or delete events.
- You can move your messages between servers with via piped CLI commands.
e.g.: echo '["REQ", "my_mirror_request_id", {"pubkey": "mynpubkey"}]' | websocat -n wss://source | jq -c '[.[0,2]]' -M | websocat wss://destination
Anyway I know there are reservations, but ultimately I think it got many of the "account" things right as compared to other fedeverse projects where the "webmaster" is still a big deal. Ideally the server side of things would be unimportant, the clients can offer compelling experiences, and people can create their own internet cul-de-sacs in a more chill way...Maybe nostr is not "the thing" but it's better than the mastodon paradigm. |
|
i believe in "can but won't fork" mentality is better than this.
all of crypto is like this already same ok, don't trust bad software? this is cool, but seems like implementation detail