| I don't think so... The general populace will use the crippled AIs presented by mainstream corporations and governments. Anyone who cares about their information will use un-crippled AIs operating without guardrails, which are always available to monitor what they read and hear, and comment on it. Sort of like when my relatives call me to analyze a potential Phishing email -- I don't do anything difficult; view the raw mail; check the DKIM signing and SPF validity, look at the full URLs of originating servers vs. the claimed From: and the document contents' claimed source, verify all transited MTAs, check the contents for malicious looking payloads, etc. Any half-decently trained LLM can do all of this, instantly and trivially, and lay out the evidence in an understandable fashion for a non-technical user. Imagine that, but amplified by an LLM trained to recognize and categorize arguments in a variety of technical fields. Not to tell you what to believe -- but to categorize the claims by its heritage vs. the main groupings of theories in that field, and then give a set of links to highly rated "for" and "against" arguments. I don't need some LLM trained by a partisan, with guard-rails set up by some corporation's legal and HR departments. I don't think most people will stand for that, when we have laptops that can already run reasonably capable LLMs w/ training on focussed datasets! |
Mostly due to the fact the most people will opt for features and convenience over privacy and liberty. The people using Brave, Minds etc will likely use non gated AI, but I suspect the most everyone else will not. Hope I'm wrong.